Abstract
This article delves into the financial and infrastructural challenges faced by host cities post-Olympics. It discusses the exorbitant costs of the bidding process, emphasizing the strain on cities and the influence of private connections and geopolitical factors on bidding outcomes. The enduring financial burdens post-Olympics are examined, along with the underutilization of Olympic infrastructure and unequal distribution of benefits among cities. Alternatives like permanent host cities or extended multi-month festivals are proposed, advocating for prioritizing athletic competition over extravagant ceremonies to reduce costs and focus on core values.