Classical Ideas of the Ultima Ratio Principle in the Modern Criminal Law Paradigm
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article, the author examines the concept of the criminal law principle “Ultima Ratio” from a scientific and theoretical position, taking into account law enforcement practice. In particular, the main ideas and directions of the classical school in interpreting this principle, as well as the scientific ideas of modern European scientists about the concept of “criminal legal minimalism” as the basis for criminalization and decriminalization, the idea of subsidiarity of criminal law, and the idea of saving criminal legal sanctions, have been studied. Based on an analysis of theories currently existing in the science of criminal law about the concept and essence of the “Ultima Ratio” principle, the author presents his scientific findings and conclusions.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Jalinsky A.E. Liberal-conservative idea and ee otrazhenie v UK RF // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2007. No. 8; Kibalnik A.G. O protivostoyanii idey v ugolovnom prave // Rossiyskiy ejegodnik ugolovnogo prava. 2007. N 2. SPb., 2008.
Jescheck, H. H. Lehrbuch des Strafrechts: Allgemeiner Teil. 5. Auflage, 1996
Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 1961
Moore, M. Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law. 1997
Stojanović Z. Granice, possibilities and legitimacy of criminal protection. Beograd: Savremena administracija, 1987. 115 str.; Garland D. Kultur der Kontrolle: Verbrechensbekämpfung und soziale Ordnung in der Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Campus-Verlag, 2008. P.394; Schünemann B. Das Strafrecht im Zeichen der Globalisierun. Goltdammer's Archiv für Strafrecht, 150, no. 5 (2003): 299–313; Albrecht P.-A. Spezialprävention angesichts neuer Tätergruppen. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 97, no. 4 (1985): 831–870.
Tagantsev N.S. Russkoe ugolovnoe pravo: Lektsii. Chast Obshchaya. 2-e izd. SPb.: Reprint, 2012. T. 1. S. 46
Husak D. Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford; New York; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2008. X, 231 p.
ASHWORTH, ANDREW: Principles of Criminal Law. Clarendon Law Series, 1995. p. 33.
AREBORG, NILS: Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2004/2 p.526.
JAREBORG (2004) p.534.
LAGODNY, OTTO: Strafrecht vor den Schranken der Grundrechte, Mohr Siebeck, 1996. p. 348.
Soglasno hungerskomu ugolovnomu zakonodatelstvu.
See more at KARSAI, KRISZTINA: Fogyasztóvédelém és büntetőjog, Hvg-orac, 2011. pp. 37-51.
Fragmentary criminal law is a concept of KARL BINDING (1902) used until today. See ROXIN, CLAUS: Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 4. Auflage. Munich, C. H. Beck, 2006. p. 45.
See more FELIX, DAGMAR: Die Einheit der Rechtsordnung. Mohr Siebeck, 1998. p. 297.
Melander, S., 2013 Ultima Ratio in European Criminal Law. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 3 (1), 42-61. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2200871
Stojanović Z. Krivičnopravni expanzionizam i razvodvosti Srbije // Stanje criminalita u Srbiji i pravna sredstva reagovanja. IV deo / ur. D. Ignjatović. Beograd: Pravni fakultet University of Beograd, 2010. Str. 32–48; Melander, S., 2013 Ultima Ratio in European Criminal Law. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online], 3 (1), 42-61. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2200871
Albrecht P.-A. Kriminologie: Eine Grundlegung zum Strafrecht. 4th ed. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2010, XXXII+422
NAGY FERENC: General part of a magyar penitentiary. Hvg-orac, Budapest, 2010. 59.p. The opinions of the Hungarian scholars are analyzed in KARSAI, KRISZTINA: Az ultima ratio elvről - másčeúl. In: "Sapienti sat" Ünnepi kötet Dr. Cséka Ervin professor 90. syrádnadzára (edited by: FANTOLY ZSANETT - JUHÁSZ ZSUZSANNA-NAGY FERENC). Acta Jur. et Paul. Thomas LXXIV. Szeged, 2012. pp. 253 - 260
JAREBORG (2004) p. 534.
Posner RA. An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law // Columbia Law Review. 1985. Vol. 85. No. 6. P. 1195.
Wessels J., Beulke W. Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. 35, neubearbeite Auflage. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag, 2005. 395 p.
Zer H. Vosstanovitelnoe pravosudie: novyy vzglyad na prestuplenie i nakazanie: per. English / obshch. ed. L.M. Karnozovoy; comment. L.M. Karnozovoy i S.A. Pashmina. M.: MOO Center "Sudebno-pravovaya reforma", 2002. URL: http://sprc.ru/?p=1323 (data obrashcheniya: 15.02.2016).
https://stat.sud.uz/file/2024/31.01.pdf
Urazbaev R.Sh., Mingalimova M.F. Prekrashchenie ugolovnyx del za primireniem storon po neschastnym sluchayam na proizvodstve so smertelnym iskhodom nezakonno // Zakonnost. 2015. No. 9. S. 64-69.
Tseneva V.V. Osvobojdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v svyazi s primireniem s poterpevshim: avtoref. dis. ... candy. walk science Tomsk, 2002. 24 p.
Friedman D.D. Law's order: what economics has to do with law and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. p. 276.
Shnitenkov A.V. Primirenie s poterpevshim kak osnovanie osvobojdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: problemy zakonodatelstva i debnoy praktiki // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2014. No. 11. S.76.