The Role of Voice in Developing EFL Students’ Public Speaking Skills
Main Article Content
Abstract
The engagement of voice assists in the performance of EFL students when it comes to public speaking engagement. In any communication, a good voice must include tonal variation, pitch, volume, pace, and enunciation, so the conveyance is both easily understood and interesting. This article discusses the obstacle that language constitutes for EFL students and how voice training can assist them in not only developing their confidence but also delivering powerful speeches. It also offers suggestions to teachers on how to encourage students practice of public speaking using vocal dynamics in the voice appropriate for the specific context of EFL classrooms. It also covers practical examples and some of the most apparent issues that arise in the process of developing vocal delivery.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Shmatova I.V. Deiksis v sisteme glagol of the modern English language. // Autoref. diss. sugar Philol. science ‒ M., 1975.
Sternin I.A. K problems deykticheskikh functional words. // Autoref. diss. sugar Philol. science ‒ M., 1973.
Jura V.V. Emotional deixis and verbal behavior in English language proficiency. Diss. ... candy. Philol. science ‒ Volgograd: VGPU, 2000.
Kravchenko A.V. Indicators of Voprosy theory: Egocentricity. Deiktichnost. Indexicality. ‒ Irkutsk, 1992.
Apresyan Yu.D. Deixis v lexike i grammatike i naivnaya model mira. // Semiotics and information. 1986, vyp. 28. ‒ S. 5-33.
Burlakova V.V. Deikticheskie category in text. // Preposition and text: semantics, pragmatics and syntax. ‒ Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU, 1988. ‒ S. 85-88.
Rakhimov S. Rechevaya communication and problem deyksisa v raznosistemnyx yazykax. ‒ Tashkent: Science, 1989. - 90 p.;
Hakimov M. History of Pragmalinguistic Studies. - Fergana, 2020. - 148 p.;
Safarov Sh. Pragmalinguistics. ‒ Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2008. ‒ B. 178.
Davlatova R.H. Deictic units of the Uzbek language: Philology. science. doc. (DSc) diss. - Tashkent, 2020.
Abdurakhmonova R.K. Text-forming functions of deictic units in languages of different systems: Philol. science. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) diss. ... autoref. – Fergana, 2018. ‒ B. 22.
Shermatov A. Expression of deixis in English scientific and technical text: Philol. science. name ... diss. autoref. ‒ Tashkent, 2008.
Boltakulova G.F. Comparative-functional study of temporality and its deictic features in English and Uzbek: Philology. science. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) diss. ... autoref. - Tashkent, 2018. ‒ 54 p.
Buhler, K. Theory language: representative function language [Text] / K. Buhler / Per. s wet. pod obshch. ed. T. V. Bulyginoy. — M.: Progress, 1993. — 501 p.
Piaget, J. Le langage et la pensée chez l'enfant [Text] / J. Piaget. —Neuchâtel: Delachaux 8r Niestlé, 1923. — 318 p.
Wellman, H. M. Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief [Text] / H. M. Wellman, D. Cross, J. Watson // Child development.—2001. — 72. — P. 655–684.
Golovenkina, L. X. Mestoimenia v rechi detey [Text] / L. X. Golovenkina // Problemy detskoy rechi-1996: materialy mejvuzovskoy conference / otv. ed. S. N. Zeitlin; Yes. Mr. un-t im. A. I. Hertsena. — SPb.: Obrazovanie, 1996. — S. 30–31.
Apresyan Yu.D. Deixis v lexike i grammatike i naivnaya model mira // Izbr. tr.: V 2-x t. - M., 1995. - T.2. Integral description of language and systematic lexicography. 631-632 — S. 629-650.
Paducheva E.V. Pragmaticheskie aspekti svyaznosti dialoga // Izv. AN USSR. Sir. lit. i write - 1982. - T.41, No. 4. - P.20-37.
Nikolina H.A. Yazykovaya igra v stixakh detey // Problemy detskoy rechi- 1997: Materialy mejvuz. conf. - SPb., 1997. - S.44-46.
Мусаева Н.К. ФАКТОРЫ ВОЗНИКНОВЕНИЯ ДЕТСКОЙ КВАЗИДИАЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ РЕЧИ.// Colloquium-journal, 2021.
Musaeva N. Reflection of the Social Environment in Children's Quasidiological Speech. // “International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis” In Volume 04 Issue 11 November 2021.
Musaeva N. SPEECH ACT EXPRESSION IN CHILDREN'S QUASIDIALOGUE // В МЕЖДУРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИХ НАУК (Т. 2, Выпуск 10, сс. 80–85). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10065357