National Identity and Solidarity Among Turkic Nations: A Comparative Sociological Study

Abstract

This article explores the intricate dynamics of national identity and solidarity among Turkic nations through a comparative sociological study, focusing on Turkey and Kyrgyzstan as pivotal case studies. The literature highlights the historical, ideological, and sociopolitical factors shaping national identity and their implications for fostering solidarity. Walker (2003) delves into Turkey's identity crisis, emphasizing the polarization between Kemalism and Islamism and advocating for a pluralistic framework to reconcile these divides. Taitelieva (2015) examines the complexities of post-Soviet nation-building in Kyrgyzstan, underscoring the challenges posed by ethnic diversity and the importance of shared values for national unity. Çinar and Taş (2017) explore the role of storytelling in the politics of Turkish nationhood, revealing how competing historical narratives shape collective memory. Vucetic (2018) offers a theoretical framework linking national identity with foreign policy, emphasizing that affirming shared identities fosters trust and collaboration. Yiğit (2022) highlights how perceptions of neighboring nations influence Turkish pre-service social studies teachers’ understanding of identity, demonstrating the relational nature of identity formation. Keskintürk and Kuyucu (2024) critique the duality in Turkish nationalism, advocating for micro-level analyses of individual motivations. Together, these studies provide a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic interplay of historical narratives, ideological divides, and individual perceptions in shaping national identity and solidarity among Turkic nations. The findings emphasize the importance of inclusive narratives and shared values to enhance cooperation and unity in this diverse region.