Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Students' Retentive Knowledge in Periodicity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
Differentiated Instruction, Retentive Knowledge, PeriodicityAbstract
This study explores effects of differentiated instruction (DI) on students' retention of periodicity concepts in chemistry, compared to conventional lecture-based teaching methods. The research answered three questions and three hypotheses. The study adopted a quasi-experimental design, involving 110 SSII chemistry students from Esan Central Local Government Area, Edo State, Nigeria, using a multi-stage sampling procedure. Two intact groups from two secondary schools were assigned to experimental and control groups, respectively. The experimental group received DI through diverse instructional methods, including gamification, collaborative learning, and tiered assignments, while the control group was taught using conventional lecture-based methods. Data were collected using the Chemistry Retention Test (CRT). the reliability of the CRT was established using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) to be 0.92. Data for the study was gathered from the scores obtained from the test and were analyzed using mean and standard deviation for the research questions, while hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Findings revealed among others that there was a significance difference with level (p-value) of 0.000, between DI and conventional lecture-based indicating that the DI improved students' retention of periodicity concepts in chemistry better than conventional lecture-based teaching methods. Therefore, the study concluded that students taught using differentiated instruction (DI) demonstrate significantly better retention of periodicity knowledge than those taught through conventional lecture-based methods. And recommendations were made among others that teachers should avoid relying solely on conventional-based methods and adopt more student-centered DI instructional strategy that encourage active learning and conceptual understanding.
References
Aluko, M. O. (2020). Cooperative instructional strategies and their impact on science learning. Journal of Educational Practices.
Aregbesola, B.G, (2023). Effects of Integrated Group Based Mastering Learning Model on Students’ Achievement in Rate of Reactants, AMAC Area Council, FCT Abuja Nigeria. Best Journal of Innovation in Science, Research and Development. 2 (8) www.bjisrd.com
Aregbesola, B. G., Ojelade, I.A. & Haastrup, D.T. (2023). Teaching Science Education in Nigeria University for Innovation, Group Collaboration, and Job Creation, Accessing Bank Loans and Creativity Society for Young Inventors. International Journal on Orange Technology. 5 (10), 26-43. https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJOT.
Carlson, S. (2015). Differentiated instruction as a strategy for effective teaching. Journal of Education and Learning.
Dabbagh, N., Marra, R. M., & Howland, J. L. (2020). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and applications (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching methods and students’ academic performance. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 675–680.
Onyishi, C. N., & Sefotho, M. M. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on the use of differentiated instruction in inclusive classrooms: Implication for teacher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 136.
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The effects of gamification on educational outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 1-31.
Smale-Jacobse, A., Meijer, P. C., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19-34.
Smit, R., & Humpert, S. (2016). Differentiated instruction in small schools: A case study on instructional practices. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(6), 853-859.
Subramaniam, R. (2016). Interest as a motivational construct in science education. Science Education Research Journal.
Thomas, P., Simonette, G., & Ramsook, R. (2020). The role of differentiated instruction in enhancing student learning outcomes. Journal of Teaching and Learning Studies.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms. ASCD.
Van de Grift, W. J. C., Van der Rijt, J., & Peeters, T. (2019). Differentiated instruction and student performance: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 687-715.