Cosmetology Terminology in Transition: A Comparative Study of Uzbek and English Neologisms
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the global expansion of the beauty and skincare industry, the field of cosmetology has witnessed a rapid proliferation of specialized terminology driven by innovation, marketing, and science. English, as the dominant language of the global beauty industry, is a primary source of neologisms that are widely adopted across linguistic borders, including in Uzbek. However, the mechanisms of term integration and the sociolinguistic implications of such borrowing remain underexplored. Despite the growing prevalence of English-based cosmetic terminology in non-English-speaking contexts, limited research has systematically compared how such terms are adapted linguistically and culturally within Uzbek. This study aims to analyze and compare neologisms in English and Uzbek within the cosmetology domain, examining lexical formation, borrowing patterns, and sociolinguistic influences. The findings reveal that English serves as a major source of cosmetology neologisms, while Uzbek adapts these through calques, hybrid formations, descriptive phrases, and direct borrowings. The influence of globalization, language prestige, education, and media contributes to a hybrid lexicon in Uzbek, where localized terms coexist with borrowed ones. The study provides a cross-linguistic perspective on how professional terminology evolves in response to global trends, offering a detailed classification of Uzbek adaptive strategies and a sociolinguistic interpretation of term adoption. Understanding the lexical and sociocultural dynamics of neologism integration can aid language policymakers, educators, and professionals in developing standardized, culturally resonant terminology for emerging fields such as cosmetology.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
[1] R. Wardhaugh и J. M. Fuller, An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 7th Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.
[2] A. Smith и J. Lee, «Cross-Linguistic Approaches to Diminutive Morphology 10», International Journal of Morphology, сс. 60–70.
[3] A. Smith и J. Lee, «Cross-Linguistic Approaches to Diminutive Morphology 10», International Journal of Morphology, сс. 60–70.
[4] O. Kagan и V. Kagan, «Diminutive Morphology in Slavic Languages», Journal of Slavic Linguistics, сс. 235–260, 2019.
[5] P. Ramat и B. Ricca, «Diminutives: A Typological Study», Linguistic Typology, сс. 1–30, 1998.
[6] D. Crystal, English as a Global Language, 2nd изд. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[7] D. Crystal, English as a Global Language, 2nd изд. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[8] R. Davies и M. Chen, «Lexical Innovation in Beauty and Health Terminology 1», Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, сс. 21–31, 2021.
[9] T. Alisherov, Linguistic Terms and Their Equivalents in Uzbek. Tashkent: Institute of Linguistics, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, 2021.
[10] T. Givón, Syntax: An Introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.
[11] M. T. Cabré, Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. John Benjamins Publishing, 1999.
[12] G. Booij, The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[13] G. Booij, The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[14] N. Karimova, «The Influence of Globalization on Beauty Industry Terminology in Uzbekistan», Philological Sciences and Language Teaching, сс. 34–42, 2022.
[15] I. Plag, Word-Formation in English. Cambridge University Press, 2003.