Specific Features of Linguistic Units Related to Public Catering

Authors

  • Sherboyev Nosir Anorboyevich Teacher of the Department of Foreign Language and Literature, National University of Uzbekistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

public catering; linguistic units; food-related vocabulary; culinary terminology; lexical units; phraseological expressions; word formation; intercultural communication.

Abstract

This article examines the specific features of linguistic units related to public catering, focusing on the lexical, semantic, structural, and functional characteristics of words and expressions used in the sphere of food service. Public catering represents a significant area of professional and everyday communication, generating a wide range of specialized vocabulary associated with food products, dishes, cooking processes, kitchen equipment, service, and establishments. The study analyzes the ways in which these linguistic units are formed, their semantic relationships, and their use in different communicative contexts. Particular attention is paid to professional terminology, borrowed words, phraseological expressions, and culturally specific vocabulary reflecting national traditions and eating habits. The research demonstrates that public-catering vocabulary is characterized by semantic diversity, terminological specificity, productivity in word formation, and close interaction between language and culture. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the linguistic organization of public-catering discourse and may be useful for lexicography, terminology studies, intercultural communication, and foreign-language teaching.

References

1. Mapes, G. (2018). (De)constructing distinction: Class inequality and elite authenticity in mediatized food discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics.

2. Montanari, M. (2006). Food Is Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.

3. Nam, K., Song, H.-J., Choi, J., & Hyun, Y.-H. (2012). Semantic annotations of culinary terms for Korean culinary manuscripts of Joseon period. Korean Semantics, 39, 149–174.

4. Roche, C. (2016). Should terminology principles be re-examined? arXiv preprint.

5. Sasamoto, R. (2023). Understanding food discourse. European Journal of Public Health, 33(Supplement_2), ckad160.076.

6. Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

7. Upah, B.N. (2014). A semantic approach to the culinary terms of Jukun and English. Awka Journal of Linguistics and Languages, 8(1).

8. Wüster, E. (1979). Introduction to the General Theory of Terminology and Terminological Lexicography. Vienna: Springer.

9. Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-28

How to Cite

Anorboyevich , S. N. . (2026). Specific Features of Linguistic Units Related to Public Catering. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 4(1), 122-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/