The Use of Corpus-Based Analysis to Enhance Students’ English Lexical Competence in Inclusive Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
As inclusive education gains prominence globally, the need for effective instructional approaches that address linguistic diversity becomes increasingly urgent. In Central Asian contexts such as Kazakhstan, transitioning from segregated to inclusive education highlights challenges in meeting diverse learners' vocabulary needs, particularly in English language learning environments. Despite growing interest in corpus-based instruction, limited research exists on its application to enhance lexical competence in inclusive settings, especially among philology students. This study aims to investigate how corpus-based analysis, informed by Vygotskian sociocultural theory, can be used to bridge lexical gaps in inclusive education. It explores pedagogical adaptations necessary to support learners with diverse cognitive, linguistic, and physical abilities. Findings reveal that integrating data-driven learning (DDL) techniques improves lexical awareness, supports differentiated instruction, and fosters learner autonomy. Adaptations such as screen reader-compatible tools and simplified corpus tasks ensure accessibility for all students. Moreover, corpus-based methods outperform traditional vocabulary instruction in building productive lexical competence, as shown by alternative assessment tools. This study contributes an interdisciplinary framework combining corpus linguistics, inclusive pedagogy, and sociocultural theory. It demonstrates how corpus tools can be tailored to universal design principles, enhancing both linguistic proficiency and equity. The research underscores the importance of teacher training in corpus methods and recommends policy shifts that align educational accessibility with technological innovation. By aligning language instruction with inclusive education principles, corpus-based learning can transform vocabulary acquisition into a more equitable, student-centered process.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
[1] Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, сс. 66–81, 2014, doi: 10.5294/laclil.2014.7.1.4.
[2] A. Van Mieghem, K. Verschueren, K. Petry, и E. Struyf, «An analysis of research on inclusive education: A systematic search and meta review», сс. 675–689, 2020, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012.
[3] D. Shin и I. S. P. Nation, «Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English», ELT Journal, сс. 339–348, 2008, doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm091.
[4] Y. Passeka и M. Somerton, «Bridging the gap: Special educators’ perceptions of their professional roles in supporting inclusive education in Kazakhstan», Disability & Society, сс. 1380–1401, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09687599.2022.2160925.
[5] M. Fayzieva, «Corpus-Based Approach to Develop Diverse Students’ Lexical Competence», , 2024, сс. 65–66.
[6] A. Boulton, «Corpus-based language learning», в The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C. A. Chapelle, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0205.
[7] F. M. Ch, «Creating materials on the basis of an integrated approach to English language teaching for blind teenagers», сс. 296–301, 2022.
[8] H. Giest, «“Defectology” revisited: A misleading term for a great conception», сс. 333–344, 2018, doi: 10.1080/08856257.2017.1397309.
[9] F. Kurniawati, A. A. de Boer, A. E. M. G. Minnaert, и F. Mangunsong, «Evaluating teacher training programs for inclusive education in developing countries», сс. 310–331, 2014, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2013.786703.
[10] L. Florian и K. Black-Hawkins, «Exploring inclusive pedagogy», т. 37, вып. 5, сс. 813–828, 2011, doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096.
[11] N. B. Ataboev, «ICT in Linguistic Studies: Application of Electronic Language Corpus and Corpus-based Analysis», сс. 4170–4176, 2019.
[12] J. Qi и A. Ha, «Inclusion in physical education: A review of literature», сс. 257–281, 2012, doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2012.697737.
[13] A. Chambers, «Integrating corpus consultation in language studies», Language Learning & Technology, сс. 111–125, 2005.
[14] N. B. Ataboev, «Problematic issues of corpus analysis and its shortcomings», ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, сс. 170–173, 2019.
[15] OECD, Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan. OECD Publishing, 2014.
[16] T. Johns, «Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning», English Language Research Journal, сс. 1–16, 1991.
[17] J. An, M. Chan, и B. Kaukenova, «Special education reforms and parental engagement in Kazakhstan», т. 74, сс. 102–115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102115.
[18] CAST, «Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2». 2018. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
[19] N. Schmitt, Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[20] B. Laufer и P. Nation, «Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production», Applied Linguistics, сс. 307–322, 1995.
[21] P. Smagorinsky, «Vygotsky and literacy research», в International Handbook of Research on Children’s Literacy, Learning and Culture, K. Hall, T. Cremin, B. Comber, и L. Moll, Ред., Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, сс. 70–83.