Teachers’ Motivational Strategies and Students’ Classroom Engagement in Public Secondary Schools in Rivers State

Authors

  • Matthews Gloria Department of Educational Psychology, Guidance and Counselling Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Port Harcourt, Rivers State Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

Teacher’s motivational strategies, classroom engagement, positive reinforcement, interactive teaching methods, teacher–student relationship

Abstract

The study investigated teachers’ motivational strategies and students’ classroom engagement in public secondary schools in Rivers State. The study adopted a correlational research design. Four research questions and four ull hypotheses guided the study. The population of the study consisted of all the 7,179 senior secondary school teachers in public secondary schools in Rivers State. The sample for the study comprised 350 teachers.  The Taro Yamane formula was used to get the sample size. A stratified random sampling technique was used for the study. The instrument for the study was a researcher-developed instrument titled Teachers’ Motivational Strategies and Students’ Classroom Engagement Scale (TMSSCES). The instrument comprised two sections: A and B. The first section was used to generate teachers’ responses on their use of motivational strategies, which consisted of 20 item statements. The second section was used to evaluate students’ enjoyment which consisted of 15 item statements. The instrument was validated by experts in Measurement and Evaluation. The test-retest technique was used to determine the reliability of the instrument. A reliability coefficient r = 0.91 was established for teachers’ motivational strategies, while a reliability coefficient r = 0.82 was established for the students’ engagement scale. Pearson Product-Moment Correlation was used to answer the research questions and test the null hypotheses. The findings of the study revealed that positive reinforcement, interactive teaching methods, teacher–student relationship strategies and use of instructional materials were significantly and positively related to students’ classroom engagement in public secondary schools in Rivers State. Consequently, the researcher recommended, among other things, that teachers should adopt consistent and meaningful positive reinforcement strategies, such as praise, constructive feedback, and recognition of effort to encourage desirable learning behaviours, while ensuring that such reinforcement is balanced and focused on promoting students’ intrinsic motivation and sustained engagement.

References

[1] A. A. Adegboye and B. O. Lawal, “Instructional materials utilisation and students’ academic engagement in secondary schools in Nigeria,” Journal of Educational Practice, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 45–53, 2021.

[2] T. O. Adeyemi, “Extrinsic motivation and students’ learning outcomes in Nigerian secondary schools,” African Journal of Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 112–120, 2019.

[3] O. T. Akinwale and J. A. Oluwatayo, “Reinforcement strategies and classroom behaviour among secondary school students in South-West Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2021.

[4] A. O. Aremu, “Effects of instructional strategies on students’ academic performance in Nigerian schools,” African Journal of Educational Research, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 112–125, 2018.

[5] S. A. Ekanem, “Instructional resources and students’ engagement in science education in Nigeria,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 321–335, 2019.

[6] C. U. Eze and F. M. Nwankwo, “Interactive teaching and students’ participation in secondary schools in Anambra State,” Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 88–101, 2021.

[7] M. A. Ibrahim, “Classroom environment and the effectiveness of interactive teaching methods in large classes,” Journal of Educational Development, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 134–142, 2020.

[8] H. Musa and S. Abdullahi, “Audio-visual materials and students’ interest in learning in Nigerian secondary schools,” Journal of Educational Media and Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2022.

[9] P. N. Nwafor and I. C. Okeke, “Teacher–student relationship and academic engagement among secondary school students,” Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 102–114, 2021.

[10] OECD, Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2020.

[11] E. A. C. Okeke, “Student engagement and learning outcomes in Nigerian secondary schools,” Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 2017.

[12] E. U. Okoro and G. O. Chukwu, “Participatory teaching methods and students’ engagement in secondary schools in South-East Nigeria,” Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 21–30, 2022.

[13] S. E. Oladipo, “Classroom engagement and students’ academic outcomes in Lagos State secondary schools,” Journal of Educational Development, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 120–134, 2021.

[14] A. R. Olatunji, “Teacher support and student engagement in Nigerian classrooms,” African Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76–89, 2020.

[15] S. O. Salami, “Teacher–student relationship and academic performance in exam-oriented school settings,” Nigerian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2018.

[16] D. H. Schunk and M. K. DiBenedetto, “Motivation and social cognitive theory,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 60, Art. no. 101832, 2020.

[17] M. T. Wang and J. S. Eccles, “School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study,” Child Development, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 1603–1620, 2013.

[18] H. T. Yusuf and A. M. Bello, “Motivation and classroom engagement among secondary school students in Northern Nigeria,” Journal of Educational Foundations, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 90–104, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Gloria, M. . (2025). Teachers’ Motivational Strategies and Students’ Classroom Engagement in Public Secondary Schools in Rivers State. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 3(12), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.5281/