Regular Teachers’ Competence in Managing Conflicting Curriculum Demands in Inclusive Education

Bebegrace Dumagan

doi:10.5281/

Authors

Bebegrace Dumagan Cebu Technological University, Main Campus, cor. M.J. Cuenco Ave. & R. Palma St., Cebu City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

Special Education, Teachers’ Workload, Conflicting Curriculum Demands, Action Plan, Descriptive-Correlational Research, Bago Elementary School

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the workload of regular teachers and their ability to navigate conflicting curriculum demands in inclusive classrooms at Bago Elementary School during School Year 2025–2026. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed. The study involved regular teacher-respondents selected through purposive sampling. Data were gathered using an adapted survey questionnaire that measured teachers’ ability to navigate conflicting curriculum demands and their workload in managing curriculum and classroom responsibilities. Frequency, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation, and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient were used to analyze the data. Results showed that the respondents generally demonstrated the ability to navigate conflicting curriculum demands in inclusive classrooms, particularly in using differentiated instructional strategies, maintaining learner engagement, and adjusting teaching approaches. However, they experienced workload demands associated with balancing curriculum requirements and inclusive practices, preparing instructional materials, completing instructional tasks, and managing administrative responsibilities. The findings also showed that teachers had limited time for lesson planning, curriculum planning, and collaboration. Correlation analysis revealed a weak positive but statistically insignificant relationship between teachers’ workload and their ability to navigate conflicting curriculum demands. The study concluded that workload was not significantly associated with teachers’ perceived ability to manage conflicting curriculum demands. It recommended the development and implementation of an Action Plan addressing instructional adaptation, curriculum management, workload concerns, and support mechanisms for inclusive education.

References

[1] R. White and G. Fletcher, “Navigating inclusive education in mainstream primary schools: A phenomenological study of teachers’ perceptions and experiences,” International Journal of Inclusive Education, pp. 1–29, 2025.

[2] A. A. Magalong and L. C. Torreon, “Teaching workload management: Its impact on teachers’ well-being and effectiveness,” American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 31–36, 2021.

[3] A. Ji, “The study on the dilemma of teachers in inclusive education in China,” Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 5, pp. 340–346, 2024.

[4] N. Pacaol, “Teacher’s workload intensification: A qualitative case study of its implications on teaching quality,” International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–60, 2021.

[5] M. B. Ambar, F. Imaniar, and I. E. Oktaviani, “Navigating challenges: Educators’ perspectives on teaching English to inclusive students in regular classrooms,” INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 512–527, 2025.

[6] M. Yusuf, M. Yaumi, and M. S. Hanafi, “Elementary teacher professionalism and workload: Case study at Palopo City elementary school,” International Journal of Asian Education, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 581–588, 2021.

[7] S. Dorji and S. Wangchuk, “Teacher’s workload and its efficacy in classroom teaching in primary schools under Punakha dzongkhag,” Acta Scientific Paediatrics, vol. 5, no. 4, 2022.

[8] S. Sharma, “Enhancing inclusive learning environments: Strategies for curriculum adaptation and modification,” in Future of Special Education in India, vol. 109, p. 121, 2024.

[9] O. Christogonus-Anyanwu and J. E. Imiruaye, “Teachers’ workload and effective teaching,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 194–207, 2024.

[10] A. J. Olson and C. A. Roberts, “Navigating barriers as special education teacher educators,” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 161–177, 2020.

[11] W. Nuwaha, G. Atukunda, and F. Kyayemagye, “The relationship between workload and teachers effectiveness in secondary schools: A case of Uganda,” in New Trends of Global Influences in Africa, p. 303, 2021.

[12] R. M. Angana and A. L. Abellana, “Evaluating the impact of workload and school environment on teachers’ occupational strain,” International Journal of All Research Writings, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 68–94, 2025.

[13] M. C. Mansouri, A. L. Miller, J. A. Kurth, L. Ruhter, C. L. Wilt, S. G. Toews, and M. E. Morningstar, “Teachers’ insights on cultivating inclusive education for students with complex support needs,” Teachers College Record, vol. 126, no. 9, pp. 118–145, 2024.

[14] C. Büscher and S. Prediger, “Teachers’ practices of integrating challenging demands of inclusive mathematics education in a professional development program,” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 209–233, 2024.

[15] V. Zydziunaite, S. Kontrimiene, T. Ponomarenko, and L. Kaminskiene, “Challenges in teacher leadership: Workload, time allocation, and self-esteem,” European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 948–962, 2020.

[16] M. F. Khattak, Z. Ullah, and S. Imran, “Bridging emotional intelligence and inclusive education: Empowering teachers to support diverse classrooms,” The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1755–1765, 2025.

[17] A. Kanwal, S. Rafiq, and A. Afzal, “Impact of workload on teachers’ efficiency and their students’ academic achievement at the university level,” Gomal University Journal of Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 131–146, 2023.

[18] M. C. Pugach, L. P. Blanton, A. M. Mickelson, and M. Boveda, “Curriculum theory: The missing perspective in teacher education for inclusion,” Teacher Education and Special Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 85–103, 2020.

[19] A. Mukhatayev, A. Biloshchytskyi, S. Biloshchytska, and A. Medetbek, “A model for planning the workload of teachers, taking into account risks and in accordance with the requirements of the European system of credit modules of higher education,” Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, pp. 91–101, 2024.

[20] K. Pak, M. S. Polikoff, L. M. Desimone, and E. Saldívar García, “The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-based reform,” AERA Open, vol. 6, no. 2, Art. no. 2332858420932828, 2020.

[21] S. Rashid, Q. A. Subhan, and M. Imran, “Impact of work life balance, workload and supervisory support on teachers’ job performance with mediating role of stress: A case of private institutions,” International Journal of Business and Management Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2022.

[22] H. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Wang, and H. Liang, “Exploring the relationship between teachers’ perceived workload, challenge-hindrance stress, and work engagement: A person-centered approach,” BMC Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 201, 2025.

[23] G. Caniglia, R. Freeth, C. Lüderitz, J. Leventon, S. P. West, B. John, et al., “Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science,” Nature Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 493–501, 2023.

[24] M. Dilek, E. Baran, and E. Aleman, “AI literacy in teacher education: Empowering educators through critical co-discovery,” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 294–311, 2025.

[25] L. M. Shea, D. Harkins, S. Ray, and L. I. Grenier, “How critical is service-learning implementation?” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 197–214, 2023.

[26] C. Preiksaitis and C. Rose, “Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of generative artificial intelligence in medical education: Scoping review,” JMIR Medical Education, vol. 9, no. 1, Art. no. e48785, 2023.

[27] M. H. Al-khresheh, “Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, Art. no. 100218, 2024.

[28] A. Kamp, Navigating the Landscape of Higher Engineering Education: Coping with Decades of Accelerating Change Ahead. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft Open Publishing, 2023.

[29] M. Goos, S. Carreira, and I. K. Namukasa, “Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: Recent developments and future directions,” ZDM–Mathematics Education, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1199–1217, 2023.

[30] R. Mulenga and H. Shilongo, “Hybrid and blended learning models: Innovations, challenges, and future directions in education,” Acta Pedagogia Asiana, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025.

[31] J. Prather, P. Denny, J. Leinonen, B. A. Becker, I. Albluwi, M. Craig, et al., “The robots are here: Navigating the generative AI revolution in computing education,” in Proc. 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2023, pp. 108–159.

[32] I. Sentryo, S. K. Muttaqin, and M. Rifaldi, “Inclusive curriculum management: Integrating diverse needs in learning,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 193–202, 2024.