From Method to Equity: Rethinking Mathematics Assessment Policies in Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study on assessment in mathematics education delves into the multifaceted dimensions of assessment methodologies, policy influences, and equity considerations. Findings reveal a diverse array of assessment strategies, advocating for a balanced approach that integrates formative assessments and project-based evaluations. High-stakes testing, influenced by educational policies, emerges as a pivotal factor shaping the assessment landscape, with unintended consequences such as curriculum narrowing and teaching-to-the-test practices. The study highlights the escalating influence of technology in assessments, emphasizing the need for thoughtful implementation to ensure accessibility and equity. Equity considerations remain a critical focus, exposing persistent disparities tied to socio-economic factors, cultural backgrounds, and gender. Culturally responsive assessment practices and inclusive strategies like differentiated instruction are emphasized as crucial for promoting fairness and creating equitable learning environments. The research underscores the intricate interplay among assessment methodologies, policies, and equity considerations, revealing their interconnected nature in shaping the overall educational landscape. The study concludes by advocating for a holistic approach that navigates the synergies and tensions between these factors, providing valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers committed to enhancing mathematics education in ways that foster inclusivity, fairness, and effectiveness.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2023). Cultural beliefs and equity in educational institutions: exploring the social and philosophical notions of ability groupings in teaching and learning of mathematics. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 28(1), 2270662.
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational researcher, 36(5), 258-267.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Chigonga, B. (2020). Formative assessment in mathematics education in the twenty-first century. Theorizing STEM education in the 21st century, 127.
Diano Jr, F., Kilag, O. K., Malbas, M., Catacutan, A., Tiongzon, B., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Towards Global Competence: Innovations in the Philippine Curriculum for Addressing International Challenges. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 295-307.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM education, 3, 1-8.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. teachers college press.
Ginsburg, M. (2009). Active-learning pedagogies as a reform initiative: Synthesis of case studies. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development.
Groenewald, E., Kilag, O. K., Unabia, R., Manubag, M., Zamora, M., & Repuela, D. (2023). The Dynamics of Problem-Based Learning: A Study on its Impact on Social Science Learning Outcomes and Student Interest. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 303-313.
Kilag, O. K., Obaner, E., Vidal, E., Castañares, J., Dumdum, J. N., & Hermosa, T. J. (2023). Optimizing Education: Building Blended Learning Curricula with LMS. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 238-250.
Kilag, O. K. T., Evangelista, T. P., Sasan, J. M., Librea, A. M., Zamora, R. M. C., Ymas, S. B., & Alestre, N. A. P. (2023). Promising Practices for a Better Tomorrow: A Qualitative Study of Successful Practices in Senior High School Education. Journal of Elementary and Secondary School, 1(1).
Kilag, O. K. T., Uy, F. T., Abendan, C. F. K., & Malbas, M. H. (2023). Teaching leadership: an examination of best practices for leadership educators. Science and Education, 4(7), 430-445.
Koretz, D. M. (2008). Measuring up. Harvard University Press.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational leadership, 68(1), 34-37.
Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
Lutchko, P. S. (2018). The Relationship Between a School District's Administrative Information Technology Budget as Proportion of the Overall Undistributed Expenditures Budget and New Jersey 2016-2017 PARCC Performance. Seton Hall University.
Manire, E., Kilag, O. K., Habig, M., Satin, R., Genovania, M. R., & Tan, S. J. (2023). A Technological Approach to Early Childhood Education: Unveiling the SEEDS Pedagogy. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 333-344.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies.
Milner IV, H. R. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 118-131.
National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Procedural fluency in mathematics: A position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ondog, J., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). A Constructivist Framework for Early Grade Numeracy: Drawing on Jean Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 308-320.
Ozan, C., & Kincal, R. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 18.
Rabi, J. I. I., Kilag, O. K., Hinayon, K., Peras, C., Dumdum, J. N., & Ledesma, E. N. (2023). TED Talks: A Catalyst for Improving Oral Communication Skills in Educational Settings. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 210-222.
Rabillas, A., Kilag, O. K., Cañete, N., Trazona, M., Calope, M. L., & Kilag, J. (2023). Elementary Math Learning Through Piaget's Cognitive Development Stages. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(4), 128-142.
Speed, K. (2020). Relationship Between Computer-Assisted Instruction and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Ascd.
Valle, J., Kilag, O. K., Villanueva, G., Escabas, F., Macapobre, H., & Poloyapoy, H. (2023). The Influence of Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming on Early Numeracy. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 42-54.