The Conversion of Secondary Schools Books into Accessible Formats for Persons with Visual Impairments and Effects on Inclusive Education in Some Selected Divisions of the North West Region of Cameroon
Main Article Content
Abstract
Inclusive education remains a cornerstone of global educational development, especially in line with the Sustainable Development Goal 4, which emphasizes equitable quality education for all learners, including those with disabilities. In Cameroon, while national policy frameworks advocate for inclusive education, the lived experiences of learners with visual impairments continue to reflect structural and systemic exclusion, particularly in secondary schools. A critical aspect of this exclusion is the lack of accessible learning materials. This study investigates the process and impact of converting secondary schools’ textbooks into accessible formats specifically braille, audio, and large print for students with visual impairments in selected divisions of the North West Region of Cameroon. The research critically examines how such conversions influence the learning experiences, academic performance, and social inclusion of visually impaired learners, as well as how these efforts affect the broader school environment’s commitment to inclusive education. The study is grounded in two primary theoretical frameworks: the Social Model of Disability and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Learning. The Social Model of Disability, originally developed by Michael Oliver (1990), views disability not as a deficit within the individual, but as a result of societal and environmental barriers. This model underscores the importance of structural interventions such as accessible materials in removing obstacles to participation. In the context of this study, it emphasizes that the lack of adapted textbooks is a disabling factor, not the impairment itself. Complementing this, Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (1978) highlights the role of social interaction and cultural tools in cognitive development. Learning materials, in this sense, act as cultural tools that mediate knowledge acquisition. Without equitable access to these tools, visually impaired students are denied equal learning opportunities, which impedes their development and inclusion. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was adopted for this research. Quantitative data were collected through structured surveys administered to 120 students (visually impaired and sighted peers), 40 teachers, and 10 school administrators across three divisions: Mezam, Ngoketunjia, and Boyo. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with 15 special education teachers and in-depth focus group discussions with 20 visually impaired pupils. The data were analyzed using SPSS for statistical correlation and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. The findings reveal that the conversion of textbooks into accessible formats has a significantly positive impact on the academic performance and classroom engagement of pupils with visual impairments. Students who used braille and audio books scored, on average, 28% higher on standardized assessments than their peers without access to such formats. Furthermore, 85% of the visually impaired students reported greater participation in class activities and increased self-confidence when accessible materials were available. Teachers also indicated that having these materials encouraged them to adopt more inclusive teaching methods, including differentiated instruction and the use of assistive technology. Despite these gains, the study also uncovers substantial barriers to implementation. These include insufficient production of accessible materials due to budgetary constraints, a lack of trained personnel in braille transcription and audio recording, and the absence of standardized guidelines for inclusive publishing in the Cameroonian secondary school system. Moreover, while policies exist to support inclusive education, their practical enforcement remains weak, particularly in rural and conflict-affected zones of the North West Region. Another significant observation is the difference in perception and awareness among teachers and administrators. While most educators acknowledge the importance of inclusive materials, only 37% had received any training in inclusive pedagogy or material adaptation. This gap underscores the need for professional development programs that not only provide skills but also challenge deficit-based perceptions of disability. Additionally, many teachers expressed uncertainty about the compatibility of accessible materials with the national curriculum, reflecting a disconnect between inclusive policy rhetoric and classroom practice.
The study also notes that the crisis in the North West Region marked by armed conflict and school closures has further compounded the challenges faced by visually impaired learners. In many cases, the few schools that previously had accessible materials have either been displaced or destroyed. However, this has also led to some innovative community-based responses, such as the use of mobile libraries and audio recordings distributed via WhatsApp and local radio. These informal solutions, while not sustainable long-term, point to the resilience of local actors and the potential of low-cost technology in promoting access. The conversion of secondary school textbooks into accessible formats is not merely a technical exercise but a fundamental component of educational justice. It enables learners with visual impairments to participate equitably, succeed academically, and be socially included in mainstream educational settings. The study affirms that while accessible learning materials significantly enhance inclusive education outcomes, they must be supported by systemic changes including policy enforcement, teacher training, investment in inclusive publishing infrastructure, and context-sensitive strategies that account for crisis realities. Based on the findings, the study recommends the institutionalization of inclusive content creation within the national curriculum development process, capacity building for educators, and partnerships between the government, NGOs, and disability rights organizations to sustainably scale the production and distribution of accessible materials. Only then can inclusive education move from policy discourse to tangible outcomes for learners with visual impairments in Cameroon and beyond.
Article Details
Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
1. Abu-Taieh, E., El-Masri, S., & Al-Sarayreh, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Journal of Computer Science, 16(4), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.482.497
2. Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-005-1298-4
3. Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
4. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
5. Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. (2006). Learning in inclusive education research: Re-mediating theory and methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30, 65–108. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001065
6. Baker, P. M., & Moon, N. W. (2008). Accessibility of e-learning and educational technology for students with disabilities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2), 1–27.
7. Chigona, A. (2017). Pedagogical shift: The impact of e-learning on learners with visual impairments in South Africa. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 13(2), 54–67.
8. Eleweke, C. J., & Rodda, M. (2002). The challenges of enhancing inclusive education in developing countries. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110110067190
9. Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2010.501096
10. Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. (2014). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (7th ed.). Pearson.
11. Garett, R., & Young, S. D. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in accessible education: Current perspectives and future prospects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1487–1503.
12. Hall, T., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. Guilford Press.
13. Kelly, B., & Phipps, L. (2006). Accessibility of e-learning: A review of current research and practice. JISC.
14. Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2016). Assistive technology for students with visual impairments in inclusive settings: A literature review. International Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 1–15.
15. Kraemer, B. R., & Blalock, D. (2020). Converting print textbooks into digital accessible formats: Implications for inclusive education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(2), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836411
16. Mangope, B., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2015). Inclusive education for learners with visual impairment in Botswana secondary schools. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62(6), 610–626.
17. Mugo, J., & Kimani, G. (2015). Inclusive education in Kenya: Assessment of progress and challenges. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(2), 158–169.
18. Mukuria, G., & Obiakor, F. E. (2004). Special education in Africa: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(1), 7–15.
19. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan.
20. Opoku, M. P. (2022). Special educators’ intentions towards supporting practice of inclusive education for students with disabilities in secondary schools in Ghana. African Journal of Disability, 11, Article 875. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v11i0.875
21. Opoku, M. P., Nketsia, W., & Agbenyega, J. F. (2017). Decade of inclusive education in Ghana: Perspectives of educators. Journal of Social Inclusion, 8(1), 119–131.
22. Reinders, H. (2011). Service learning and inclusion of students with disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1230–1239.
23. Rose, D. H., & Dalton, B. (2009). Learning to read in the digital age. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01057.x
24. Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge.
25. Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. Routledge.
26. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2021). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
27. UNESCO. (2019). Global education monitoring report 2019: Inclusion and education. UNESCO Publishing.
28. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO Publishing.
29. UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021/2: Non-state actors in education. UNESCO Publishing.
30. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations.
31. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
33. World Bank. (2018). Inclusive education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and challenges. World Bank.
34. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World report on disability. WHO.
35. Zajda, J. (2020). Globalisation and inclusive education: Impacts and challenges. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(5), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1789447