Moral Needs and Their Role in The Development of Human Society

Main Article Content

Boytemirova Zarina Dadajonovna

Abstract

This article investigates the critical role of moral needs in human nature, tracing their historical formation from primitive societies where they emerged unconsciously through traditions and customs. While existing studies address moral values and norms, a significant knowledge gap remains regarding how these moral needs evolve alongside human cognitive, emotional, and social development. Using a qualitative, interdisciplinary method that synthesizes philosophical, anthropological, sociological, and psychological perspectives, this study identifies key patterns in the evolution of moral needs and their connection to human thought, consciousness, and moral imagination. The findings reveal that moral needs—such as justice, empathy, and fairness—are both biologically rooted and culturally shaped, adapting over time to societal complexities and global challenges. The results highlight the enduring significance of moral needs in shaping social cooperation, institutional frameworks, and ethical behavior, with implications for fostering moral education, intercultural dialogue, and ethical policy-making in today’s rapidly changing world.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dadajonovna, B. Z. (2025). Moral Needs and Their Role in The Development of Human Society. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 3(5), 301-305. https://doi.org/10.5281/

References

[1] Z. Bauman, Postmodern Ethics, Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993.

[2] R. Benedict, Patterns of Culture, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1934.

[3] F. Boas, The Mind of Primitive Man, New York, NY: Macmillan, 1911.

[4] D. E. Brown, Human Universals, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

[5] É. Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Paris: Alcan, 1912.

[6] C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

[7] J. Haidt, “The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment,” Psychol. Rev.., vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 814–834, 2001.

[8] D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, London: John Noon, 1740.

[9] I. Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, 1785.

[10] L. Kohlberg, The Development of Modes of Moral Thinking and Choice in the Years Ten to Sixteen, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Chicago, 1958.

[11] M. Nussbaum, Sex and Social Justice, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1999.

[12] J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.

[13] A. MacIntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

[14] M. Walzer, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York, NY: Basic Books, 1983.

[15] T. Nagel, Mortal Questions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.