Senior High School Environmental Education Integration: A Systematic Review of Related Literature
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This systematic review delves into the integration of environmental education into senior high school curricula, offering an in-depth analysis of its rationales, methods, impacts, challenges, and global perspectives. Adolescence, as a crucial period for values and behaviors formation, provides a compelling rationale for instilling environmental responsibility and stewardship in the next generation. Moreover, the urgency of global environmental challenges necessitates informed and engaged citizens. A diverse array of methods and approaches, including dedicated courses, cross-curricular infusion, and the utilization of technology and multimedia tools, empowers educators to engage and inspire students. These approaches not only impart knowledge but also foster the skills and values essential for tackling complex environmental issues. The systematic review unequivocally demonstrates the profound impact of environmental education on students. It enhances environmental awareness, knowledge, and pro-environmental attitudes, leading to tangible behavioral changes. Moreover, students often become advocates for environmental change within their communities, amplifying the societal impact of this education. However, challenges such as teacher training, stakeholder resistance, and variable program quality persist. Addressing these challenges necessitates collaborative efforts among educators, policymakers, and researchers. The study concludes by highlighting the global commitment to environmental education, showcasing initiatives from Australia, Europe, Japan, and beyond. In a world grappling with unprecedented environmental crises, the integration of environmental education into senior high school curricula emerges as a beacon of hope, a testament to education's power to shape values, inspire action, and contribute to a more sustainable future.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Ardoin, N. M., Clark, C., & Kelsey, E. (2013). An exploration of future trends in environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 499-520.
Ashmann, S., & Franzen, R. L. (2017). In what ways are teacher candidates being prepared to teach about the environment? A case study from Wisconsin. Environmental Education Research, 23(3), 299-323.
Boca, G. D., & Saraçlı, S. (2019). Environmental education and student’s perception, for sustainability. Sustainability, 11(6), 1553.
Collins, C., Corkery, I., McKeown, S., McSweeney, L., Flannery, K., Kennedy, D., & O’Riordan, R. (2020). Quantifying the long-term impact of zoological education: a study of learning in a zoo and an aquarium. Environmental Education Research, 26(7), 1008-1026.
Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental literacy in America: What ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the US. National Environmental Education & Training Foundation.
E. Dyment, J., Hill, A., & Emery, S. (2015). Sustainability as a cross-curricular priority in the Australian curriculum: A Tasmanian investigation. Environmental Education Research, 21(8), 1105-1126.
Erdoğan, M. (2009). Fifth grade students’ environmental literacy and the factors affecting students’ environmentally responsible behaviors.
Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56-81.
Guo, F., Meadows, M. E., Duan, Y., & Gao, C. (2020). Geography pre-service teachers’ perspectives on multimedia technology and environmental education. Sustainability, 12(17), 6903.
Kilag, O. K. T., Miñoza, J. L., Ledesma, E. N. B., Dosdos, B. V. C., Poloyapoy, B. N. M., & Lisao, C. Y. (2023). Shepherding nature: The environmental degradation. Science and Education, 4(1), 129-147.
Kilag, O. K. T., Diano Jr, F. M., Malbas, M. H., Mansueto, D. P., Villar, S. P., & Arcillo, M. T. (2023). The role of servant leadership in creating a positive school climate. Science and Education, 4(5), 933-942.
Kilag, O. K. T., Taboada, A. R. G., Zamora, M. B., Rabi, J. I. I. A., Calzada, J. R. D., & Manire, E. A. (2023). Exploring Effective Environmental Education Practices to Enhance Environmental Awareness and Education: A Navigational Study. International Journal of Formal Education, 2(6), 14-27.
Kilag, O. K. T., Gepitulan, P. M. L., Villarin, S. C., Cabaluna, J. P., Cariego Jr, V. M., & Paras, M. J. (2023). Eco-Philosophy: Environmental Consciousness and Educational Program. Web of Scholars: Multidimensional Research Journal, 2(6), 79-89.
Kilag, O. K. T., Mag-aso, J. N., Poloyapoy, K. B. M., Gamboa, A. C. H., Mantua, A. M. V., & Rivamonte, W. D. (2023). Technical Vocational Education in the Philippines for Sustainable Development. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(2), 57-70.
Kilag, O. K. T., Evangelista, T. P., Sasan, J. M., Librea, A. M., Zamora, R. M. C., Ymas, S. B., & Alestre, N. A. P. (2023). Promising Practices for a Better Tomorrow: A Qualitative Study of Successful Practices in Senior High School Education. Journal of Elementary and Secondary School, 1(1).
Kopnina, H. (2014). Revisiting education for sustainable development (ESD): Examining anthropocentric bias through the transition of environmental education to ESD. Sustainable development, 22(2), 73-83.
Loughlin, C., & Barling, J. (2001). Young workers' work values, attitudes, and behaviours. Journal of occupational and organizational Psychology, 74(4), 543-558.
MacGill, B. (2022). The Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA)—holding responsibility: the arts curriculum and the cross-curriculum priorities. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(2), 185-189.
Morris, P., & Chan, K. K. (1997). Cross-curricular themes and curriculum reform in Hong Kong: Policy as discourse. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(3), 248-262.
Neundorf, A., Smets, K., & García-Albacete, G. M. (2013). Homemade citizens: The development of political interest during adolescence and young adulthood. Acta politica, 48, 92-116.
Saltmarsh, J. (2005). The civic promise of service learning. Liberal education, 91(2), 50-55.
Seikkula-Leino, J., Jónsdóttir, S. R., Håkansson-Lindqvist, M., Westerberg, M., & Eriksson-Bergström, S. (2021). Responding to global challenges through education: Entrepreneurial, sustainable, and pro-environmental education in nordic teacher education curricula. Sustainability, 13(22), 12808.
UNESCO (1977). A 30-year struggle; the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UNESCO Courier: a window open on the world, XXX, 11, p. 28-29, 32, illus.
Uy, F. T., Sasan, J. M., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). School Principal Administrative-Supervisory Leadership During the Pandemic: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 5(1), 44-62.
van de Wetering, J., Leijten, P., Spitzer, J., & Thomaes, S. (2022). Does environmental education benefit environmental outcomes in children andadolescents? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101782.
Wassie, S. B. (2020). Natural resource degradation tendencies in Ethiopia: a review. Environmental systems research, 9(1), 1-29.
Yusliza, M. Y., Amirudin, A., Rahadi, R. A., Nik Sarah Athirah, N. A., Ramayah, T., Muhammad, Z., ... & Mokhlis, S. (2020). An investigation of pro-environmental behaviour and sustainable development in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12(17), 7083.
Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013).Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of cleaner production, 48, 126-138.