Prejudice in the Legal Field
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In modern philosophy, any event or object is viewed through the prism of the unity of content and form, with form acting as a way of expressing content. This concept is especially relevant when analyzing evidence that cannot be considered as such unless presented in the form required by law. The article compares evidence with facts to determine whether a crime was committed on their basis, whether the person is guilty of committing it, and also examines other circumstances of the case that affect the degree of responsibility of this person.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Sardorovich U. S. PREJUDICE IS THE FINAL KEY TO EVALUATING EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS //World Bulletin of Management and Law. – 2023. – Т. 18. – С. 55-57.
Sardorovich, U. S. (2023). PREJUDICE IS THE FINAL KEY TO EVALUATING EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. World Bulletin of Management and Law, 18, 55-57.
Suyunova D., Uralov S. Features Of The Institution Of Prejudice In Criminal Proceedings //The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology. – 2021. – Т. 3. – №. 06. – С. 100-103.
Suyunova, D., & Uralov, S. (2021). Features Of The Institution Of Prejudice In Criminal Proceedings. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 3(06), 100-103.
Joldasbaevna, Suyunova Dilbar, and Uralov Sarbon Sardorovich. "Features Of The Institution Of Prejudice In Criminal."
Sardorovich U. S., Marcelli A. PREJUDICE IN EVIDENCE AND PROOF //Ответственный редактор. – 2021. – С. 22.
Sardorovich, U. S., & Marcelli, A. (2021). PREJUDICE IN EVIDENCE AND PROOF. Ответственный редактор, 22.
Murray J. Prejudice-based rights in criminal procedure //University of Pennsylvania Law Review. – 2020. – С. 277-329.
Scott Jr A. W. State Criminal Procedure, The Fourteenth Amendment, and Prejudice //Nw. UL Rev. – 1954. – Т. 49. – С. 319.
Kerr E. Prejudice, Procedure, and a Proper Presumption: Restoring the Remmer Presumption of Prejudice in Order to Protect Criminal Defendants' Sixth Amendment Rights //Iowa L. Rev. – 2007. – Т. 93. – С. 1451.
Jourdan C. Criminal Law and Procedure-Jury Separation-Burden of Proof of Prejudice to Defendant. – 1980.
Vidmar N. Case studies of pre-and midtrial prejudice in criminal and civil litigation //Law and Human Behavior. – 2002. – Т. 26. – №. 1. – С. 73-105.
Shevchuk A. Prejudice in Criminal Law: Legal Interpretation //Available at SSRN 4101197. – 2021.
Klarman M. J. The racial origins of modern criminal procedure //Mich. L. Rev. – 2000. – Т. 99. – С. 48.
Kuznetsova O. A., Stepanov V. V. Prejudice as an Interdisciplinary Issue //Jurist [Lawyer]. – 2009. – №. 6. – С. 57-59.
Lewis D. C. Proof and Prejudice: A Constitutional Challenge to the Treatment of Prejudicial Evidence in Federal Criminal Cases //Wash. L. Rev. – 1989. – Т. 64. – С. 289.
Muratova N. G. Prejudice: Interrelation of the Court Procedures //Perm U. Herald Jurid. Sci. – 2010. – Т. 9. – С. 194.
Novozhilov A. Prejudice and Criminal Law: Trends and Interpretation //Available at SSRN 4101352. – 2021.
Roberts J. Proving Prejudice, Post-Padilla //Howard LJ. – 2010. – Т. 54. – С. 693.
Goldstein A. S. The state and the accused: Balance of advantage in criminal procedure //Yale LJ. – 1959. – Т. 69. – С. 1149.
Evans J. S. Civil and Criminal Procedure-Disqualification of District Judges for Prejudice in Wyoming //Land & Water L. Rev. – 1970. – Т. 6. – С. 743.
Hansen R. A. Criminal Procedure—Preaccusation Delay as Violation of Due Process: Absence of Statute of Limitations Is Factor to Be Weighed Against Murder Defendant's Allegations of Actual Prejudice—State v. Haga, 8 Wn. App. 481, 507 P. 2d 159 (1973), review denied 82 Wn. 2d 1006 (1973) //Washington Law Review. – 1974. – Т. 49. – №. 3. – С. 973.
Thorn C. A. Criminal Procedure-Prejudice Presumed and Reversal Automatic When Joint Representation Required after Denial of Timely Motion for Separate Counsel //Cumb. L. Rev. – 1978. – Т. 9. – С. 591.
Uralov , S. . “Nekotorыe voprosы realizatsii instituta preyuditsii v ugolovno-protsessualnom zakonodatelstve Respubliki Uzbekistan”. Obщestvo i innovatsii, t. 5, vыp. 2/S, fevral 2024 g., ss. 62-65, doi:10.47689/2181-1415-vol5-iss2/S-pp62-65.
Sardorovich U. S. DYNAMICS AND CURRENT STATE OF YOUTH CRIME IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN //World Bulletin of Management and Law. – 2024. – Т. 31. – С. 9-12.