REVISITING LOW DOSE RADIOBIOLOGY: MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Main Article Content

Sajjad Mohammed Salman Jaddah
Mohammad Reza Deevband
Abdullah Abbas Ibadi

Abstract

Low-dose radiobiology focuses on the biological effects of ionizing radiation at absorbed doses that are less than about 100 mGy or low dose rates (less than 10 mGy/h -1). These exposures are common, and they include the diagnostic imaging, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy scatter, occupational and environmental exposures, radon exposures and space travel. Although widespread, the biological effects of low dose radiation (LDR) have not been fully defined and they persistently troubles the current radiation risk assessment systems. Linear no-threshold (LNT) radiation protection has been the basis upon which radiation protection has depended over decades, wherein a proportional relationship exists between dose and stochastic risk and there exists no safe dose. Despite the fact that LNT has offered a conservative and practical regulatory foundation, increasing experimental and mechanistic information suggests that it is not sufficiently comprehensive of biological responses in the low-dose area. Recent developments in the field of molecular biology, epigenetics, microdosimetry, and systems biology show that LDR can trigger adaptive signaling, non-targeted, and long-lasting epigenetic reprogramming without causing a corresponding DNA damage. The responses tend to be qualitative as opposed to high-dose effects being extended in a linear manner. This is a critical review of the empirical and biological basis of the LNT paradigm against modern mechanistic data, a comparison with currently evolving non-linear dose response models, and epigenetic regulation as the key determinant of low dose effects. Combining historical information with the current experimental and clinical data, we will seek to answer the current controversies, and provide a way forward in terms of biologically informed but pragmatically feasible models of low-dose radiation risk assessment.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

REVISITING LOW DOSE RADIOBIOLOGY: MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. (2026). Innovative: International Multidisciplinary Journal of Applied Technology (2995-486X), 4(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.51699/eaedxq67

References

[1] R. Wakeford, “The linear no threshold hypothesis: An evaluation,” Journal of Radiological Protection, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. R1–R19, 2019.

[2] M. Hauptmann, D. Brenner, J. B. Little, R. E. Shore, and E. J. Hall, “Epidemiological evidence on low dose radiation and cancer risk,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. e181–e192, 2020.

[3] S. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, and J. M. Kaminski, “The linear no threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data,” Radiology, vol. 251, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2009.

[4] D. J. Brenner et al., “Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 100, no. 24, pp. 13761–13766, 2003.

[5] R. E. J. Mitchel, “Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: Evolutionary origins,” Dose Response, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75–90, 2007.

[6] K. M. Prise and J. M. O’Sullivan, “Radiation induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 351–360, 2009.

[7] C. Mothersill and C. Seymour, “Radiation induced bystander effects: Past history and future directions,” Radiation Research, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 759–767, 2001.

[8] S. A. Kovalchuk and O. Kovalchuk, “Epigenetic regulation of genome stability in response to ionizing radiation,” Radiation Research, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 265–276, 2013.

[9] M. Averbeck, “Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low dose radiation risk extrapolation?” Health Physics, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 493–504, 2009.

[10] J. B. Little, E. I. Azzam, S. M. de Toledo, and T. Nagasawa, “Impact of non targeted effects on radiation risk estimation,” Radiation Research, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 802–814, 2010.

[11] A. Feinendegen, “Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, no. 925, pp. 3–7, 2005.

[12] E. I. Azzam, S. M. de Toledo, and J. B. Little, “Oxidative metabolism, gap junctions and the ionizing radiation induced bystander effect,” Oncogene, vol. 22, no. 45, pp. 7050–7057, 2003.

[13] R. L. Ullrich and J. B. Storer, “Influence of gamma irradiation on the development of neoplastic disease in mice,” Radiation Research, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 317–324, 1979.

[14] M. Durante, F. A. Cucinotta, and M. Yamada, “Radiation dose response relationships at low doses,” Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 483–496, 2018.

[15] S. R. Hamada, Y. T. Fujimichi, and K. I. Kashino, “Biological effects of low dose radiation,” Mutation Research Reviews in Mutation Research, vol. 770, pp. 22–47, 2018.

[16] R. E. Shore, K. Beck, and D. Brenner, “Radiation protection standards: Biological and epidemiological considerations,” Radiation Research, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 315–327, 2018.

[17] A. Fornalski, L. E. Feinendegen, and J. Dobrzyński, “The LNT model and cancer risk: A systems biology perspective,” Dose Response, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2020.

[18] M. Tapio and A. Jacob, “Radioadaptive response revisited,” Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 347–357, 2020.

[19] N. F. P. B. Kinner, Y. Wu, C. Staudt, and G. Iliakis, “γ H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA double strand breaks in low dose radiation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 2017–2029, 2018.

[20] G. Iliakis, Y. Murmann, and J. S. Soni, “Alternative end joining repair pathways and genomic instability,” Trends in Genetics, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 590–600, 2015.

[21] O. Kovalchuk, S. A. Kovalchuk, and I. Pogribny, “Radiation induced epigenetic dysregulation,” Epigenomics, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 815–830, 2020.

[22] A. Pogribny and I. Rusyn, “Environmental radiation exposure and epigenetic memory,” Mutation Research, vol. 850–851, pp. 303–313, 2021.

[23] M. Sprung, J. Forrester, and K. Kadhim, “Non coding RNAs in low dose radiation response,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 12, article 715, 2021.

[24] C. Mothersill, B. Seymour, and K. M. Prise, “Dose rate effects and non targeted radiation responses,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 363–372, 2019.

[25] R. Schneider, M. Kaser, and B. Folkerts, “Integrating systems biology into radiation research,” Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 297–308, 2020.

[26] P. Chaudhry, “High throughput omics for radiation biodosimetry,” Cells, vol. 8, no. 9, article 1023, 2019.

[27] D. J. Brenner and E. J. Hall, “Computed tomography — An increasing source of radiation exposure,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 22, pp. 2277–2284, 2007.

[28] J. M. Boone, N. E. Seibert, and S. R. Lindfors, “Size specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT exams,” Radiology, vol. 263, no. 2, pp. 578–585, 2012.

[29] S. Amundson and M. B. Fornace, “Development of gene expression signatures for radiation biodosimetry,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 677–709, 2012.

[30] H. R. Withers, “Biological mechanisms supporting dose and dose rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) estimation,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 742–754, 2020.