Improving Methods for Effective Elimination of Natural Disasters

Authors

  • A.N. Doniyorov Independent researchers, Training Center for Employees of the Ministry of Poverty Reduction and Employment Author
  • Sh. Khusanov Independent researchers, Training Center for Employees of the Ministry of Poverty Reduction and Employment Author
  • G.G. Bekova Independent researcher, Tashkent State Technical University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/h9h1v530

Keywords:

Earthquakes, fires, buildings and structures, injuries, tectonic shocks, population, flammability levels and exercises. Introduction

Abstract

Earthquake-induced secondary fires are frequent, potentially worsening human and infrastructure losses and prolonging the duration of relief efforts. All this implies that effectively putting out such fires necessitates not only technical firefighting skills but also accurate forecasting of fire progression, alongside coordinated tactical responses in the face of unpredictable structural circumstances. Nonetheless, what is lacking in both practice and research is the often-overlooked essential connection regarding the coordination of joint actions between fire and rescue units and the community during significant earthquakes and other emergencies.

This research addresses this gap by examining the efficiency of preventive and tactical measures aimed at the swift and successful elimination of fires that arise following tectonic shocks, encompassing patterns of fire spread, combustion circumstances, and operational training frameworks. We examine research by analytically reviewing fire development factors, analyzing earthquake-related damage patterns in buildings, evaluating training practices, and assessing coordinated response strategies from both regulatory and practical viewpoints.

The research findings revealed that a limited number of factors impact the decrease in fire extinguishing time, which can be improved through heightened fire resistance of buildings or other structures under seismic protection, along with more effective coordination of evacuations and better collaboration among all governing authorities, civil protection agencies, and the local community. The findings indicate that organized preventive actions such as reducing construction density, improving water supply access, and using fire-resistant building materials can significantly help in fighting fires.

Practice implications involve combining seismic and fire safety strategies; coordinating emergency efforts with local communities; and ensuring consistent, high-quality tactical training that minimizes overall response time to earthquake impacts

References

[1]. C. Scawthorn, J. Eidinger, and A. Schiff, Eds., Fire Following Earthquake. Reston, VA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005.

[2]. C. Scawthorn, “Fire following earthquake,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 1987.

[3]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage: A Practical Guide (FEMA E-74), Washington, DC, USA: FEMA, 2012.

[4]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450), Washington, DC, USA: FEMA, 2003.

[5]. National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, Quincy, MA, USA: NFPA, 2023.

[6]. National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 101: Life Safety Code, Quincy, MA, USA: NFPA, 2022.

[7]. European Committee for Standardization, EN 1998 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Brussels, Belgium: CEN, 2004.

[8]. U.S. Geological Survey, “Earthquake Hazards Program,” Reston, VA, USA, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://earthquake.usgs.gov

[9]. D. Alexander, Principles of Emergency Planning and Management. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2002.

[10]. D. Drysdale, An Introduction to Fire Dynamics, 3rd ed. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 2011.

[11]. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2016.

[12]. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, Geneva, Switzerland: UNDRR, 2015.

[13]. A. Coburn, R. Spence, and A. Pomonis, Vulnerability and Risk Assessment. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Architectural Research, 1994.

[14]. K. J. Tierney, M. K. Lindell, and R. W. Perry, Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC, USA: Joseph Henry Press, 2001.

[15]. International Association for Fire Safety Science, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fire Safety Science. Waterloo, ON, Canada: IAFSS, various years.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

Improving Methods for Effective Elimination of Natural Disasters. (2026). Innovative: International Multidisciplinary Journal of Applied Technology (2995-486X), 4(2), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.51699/h9h1v530

Similar Articles

11-20 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.