STRUCTURAL-DERIVATIONAL STUDY OF SYNONYMY, HOMONYMY, AND POLYSEMY PHENOMENA IN METALLURGICAL TERMINOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cmctr150Keywords:
Metallurgical Terminology, English Language, Synonymy, Homonymy, Polysemy, Structural Analysis, Derivation, Term Formation, Semantic Relationships, Lexical Units, Scientific-Technical Terms, Context, Terminological System, Linguistic ResearchAbstract
This article provides a profound structural-derivational analysis of synonymy, homonymy, and polysemy phenomena found in English metallurgical terminology. Due to the rapid development of the metallurgical industry's terminology under the conditions of modern scientific and technological progress, studying the semantic and structural characteristics of its lexical units is of significant importance. Throughout the research, the formation sources of metallurgical terms, their derivational models, as well as the semantic relationships between terms are systematically analyzed. In the article, the phenomenon of synonymy is highlighted through the expression of metallurgical terms in alternative forms, based on their scope of application and functional differences. The phenomenon of homonymy is examined through the example of terms that possess the same form but carry different meanings, and the mechanisms of their contextual differentiation are identified. Within the framework of the polysemy phenomenon, the expression of several interrelated meanings by a single term is analyzed based on the stages of their historical and functional development. Based on a structural-derivational approach, the study investigates metallurgical terms formed through word-building methods such as affixation, composition, and conversion, revealing the processes of their semantic expansion and specialization. Furthermore, the interactions of English metallurgical terminology with the terminology of other languages, particularly the Uzbek language, and translation challenges are partially covered. The results of this article serve as a theoretical and practical basis for systematizing metallurgical terminology, accurately interpreting scientific-technical texts, and compiling terminological dictionaries.
References
[1] Sh. A. Utkirova, “Theoretical and practical significance of semantic phenomena in metallurgical terminology of English and Uzbek languages,” American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education, 2024.
[2] L. A. Rikhsieva, “Linguistic features of English geological terminology and the problems of its translation,” Foreign Languages in Uzbekistan Journal, 2026.
[3] M. S. Khajieva, “Types of synonyms and polysemy lexis in English and Uzbek languages,” Web of Scientist Journal, 2022.
[4] M. S. Kayumova and G. X. Shodieva, “Homonymy and polysemy in English and Uzbek languages,” Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 2021.
[5] M. B. Elmirzayeva, “Comparative linguistic analysis of homonymy and polysemy in English and Uzbek languages,” Texas Journal of Philology, Culture and History, 2024.
[6] Sh. Sh. Jumayeva, “Comparative typological analysis of homonymy and polysemy,” European Scholar Journal, 2022.
[7] T. Halai, Y. Hrybinyk, and O. Tsaruk, “Features of polysemy and homonymy in English geological terminology,” Scientific Bulletin of Philology, 2023.
[8] O. S. Abdurakhmonov, Lexicology and Translation Theory, Tashkent: Uzbekistan National University Press, 2008.
[9] M. G‘ulomov, Linguistics and Translation Theory, Tashkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti, 2008.
[10] A. S. Hornby, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[11] E. S. Ginzburg and S. S. Khidekel, A Course in Modern English Lexicology. Moscow: Higher School, 1979.
[12] L. V. Minayeva, English Lexicology and Lexicography. Moscow: Higher School, 2003.
[13] J. Lyons, Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[14] V. N. Komissarov, Theory of Translation. Moscow: Higher School, 1990.
[15] A. S. Abdullaeva, English Lexical Semantics in Technical Terminology, Tashkent State University, 2019.