Implicature Among Related Semantic Phenomena

Main Article Content

Gulrukh Eshankulova Turakulovna

Abstract

 


The study of subtextual phenomena is crucial in modern linguistics for understanding implicit meaning in literary discourse. While implicature, presupposition, and implication have been individually explored, their comparative semantic features within literary text analysis remain insufficiently studied. There is a lack of integrated theoretical frameworks explaining how implicature differs from other implicit meaning types in literary interpretation. This article aims to analyze implicature among related semantic phenomena such as implication and presupposition, clarifying their roles in decoding hidden meanings within texts. The study finds that implicatures convey non-literal meanings requiring inference from context and background knowledge, while presuppositions are propositional assumptions perceived as self-evident by both producer and recipient. Implication operates as a logical connection represented in microcontexts but is distinct from meaning itself. The research offers a theoretical synthesis differentiating these semantic categories, emphasizing that implicatures are generated during speech acts rather than existing as background propositions. This analysis contributes to linguistic semantics by enhancing interpretive strategies for subtextual reading and informing future research on decoding implicit structures in literature, thereby deepening understanding of semantic multilayeredness in literary texts.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Turakulovna, G. E. . (2025). Implicature Among Related Semantic Phenomena. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 3(7), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.5281/

References

[1] U. Eco, A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press, 1976.

[2] R. Jakobson, Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics. MIT Press, 1960.

[3] M. A. K. Halliday и R. Hasan, Cohesion in English. Longman, 1976.

[4] C. S. Peirce, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press, 1931.

[5] J. L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962.

[6] V. V. Dementiev, Indirect Communication. Gnosis, Moscow, 2006.

[7] K. A. Dolinine, «Linguistic-Semiotic Foundations of the Interpretation of Prose Literary Texts (French Language)», Doctor of Philological Sciences Dissertation, Leningrad, 1988.

[8] S. C. Levinson, Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 1983.

[9] R. S. Stalnaker, «Pragmatics», в New in Foreign Linguistics, Issue XVI, Moscow, 1983, сс. 419–438.

[10] G. N. Leech, Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, 1983.

[11] R. Barthes, Selected Works: Semiotics. Poetics. Progress, Moscow, 1989.

[12] J. R. Searle, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, 1969.

[13] O. P. Vorobyeva, Text Categories and the Factor of the Addressee. Vyshcha Shkola, Kyiv, 1993.

[14] Y. M. Lotman, The Structure of Artistic Text. Iskusstvo, Moscow, 1970.

[15] G. I. Bohin, Typology of Text Understanding. KSU, Kalinin, 1986.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.