"Analyzing the Impact of the Program for International Student Assessment on Technology Use in English Listening Classes"
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The widespread adoption of technology in language learning has become a topic of increasing interest in recent years. Particularly, the use of technology in English listening classes has been the focus of numerous studies, as it has the potential to enhance the learning experience and improve student outcomes. This article delves into investigating the impact of the Program for International Student Assessment on the use of technology in English listening classes and also employing a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of performance data with qualitative insights from teacher interviews and classroom observations. Data is gathered from school 41 that actively incorporate PISA-oriented strategies in their curricula. The findings indicate that while PISA has led to an increased focus on integrating technology into language classes, the extent of its impact varies widely based on factors such as access to resources, teacher training, and institutional support.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Yang, Y. T. C., Chuang, Y. C., Li, L. Y., & Tseng, S. S. (2013). A blended learning environment for individualized English listening and speaking integrating critical thinking. Computers & Education, 63, 285-305.
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the programme for international student assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333-353
Anderson, J. O., Lin, H. S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 591-614.
Sacher W.. Jenseits von PISA: Wege einer neuen Prüfungskultur (Schule und Unterricht)// Auer Verlag in der AAP Lehrerwelt GmbH, 2005.- 140 p
https://www.bmbf.de/de/pisa-programme-for-international-student-assessment-81.html
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Bax, S. (2011). Normalization Revisited: The Effective Use of Technology in Language Education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcallt.2011040101 8. Rost, M. (2013). Teaching and Researching Listening (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Кабилова, Н. (2021). COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND PRAGMATIC INFLUENCE. ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz), 8(8).
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.
Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics and Science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968 15.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2018-insights-and-interpretations.pdf
Zhao, Y., & Lei, J. (2010). Technology Use and the Future of Schooling: Implications for Education Policy. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 492–499.