THE IMPACT OF ERGONOMIC APPROACHES ON EFFICIENCY IN THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY SYSTEM

Article Sidebar

View article
Published: 2025-12-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51699/y32vzf18
Keywords:
ergonomics, occupational safety, human factor, labor productivity, occupational risks

Main Article Content

Razzokov Xabib Xolikovich
Associate Professor, Department of Occupational Safety and Health Engineering, Samarkand State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Abstract

The paper analyzes inventive approaches of ergonomics in improving occupational safety and labor productivity in the system of providing occupational safety. The impact of ergonomic working conditions on occupational risk of injury and illness, work fatigue, and performance measures are evaluated using theoretical as well as applied research. Features of assessment of ergonomic conditions are offered and the statistical processing of results of realization of the offers is carried out. The results revealed that the inclusion of ergonomics in the occupational safety system can contribute to a considerable increase in labor safety and work productivity.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 12 (2025): Innovative: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Applied Technology

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE IMPACT OF ERGONOMIC APPROACHES ON EFFICIENCY IN THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY SYSTEM. (2025). Innovative: International Multidisciplinary Journal of Applied Technology (2995-486X), 3(12), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.51699/y32vzf18

References

1. International Labour Organization, Safety and Health at the Heart of the Future of Work. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO, 2019.

2. J. Dul and B. Weerdmeester, Ergonomics for Beginners: A Quick Reference Guide. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2008.

3. E. Grandjean and K. H. E. Kroemer, Fitting the Task to the Human: A Textbook of Occupational Ergonomics. London, United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis, 2009.

4. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 45001: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2018.

5. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 6385: Ergonomic Principles in the Design of Work Systems. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2016.

6. P. M. Bongers, C. R. de Winter, M. A. J. Kompier, and V. H. Hildebrandt, “Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Helsinki, Finland, 1993.

7. European Commission, Occupational Safety and Health Strategic Framework 2021–2027. Brussels, Belgium, 2021.

8. Republic of Uzbekistan, Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Occupational Safety”. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2016.

9. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Collection of Regulatory and Legal Documents on Working Conditions Assessment and Occupational Safety. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2019.

10. D. B. Chaffin, G. B. J. Andersson, and B. J. Martin, Occupational Biomechanics. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2006.

11. B. W. Niebel and A. Freivalds, Engineering Industrial Ergonomics. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill, 2009.

12. S. Pheasant and C. M. Haslegrave, Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2016.

13. A. Hedge, Ergonomic Workplace Design for Health, Wellness, and Productivity. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2017.

14. K. H. E. Kroemer and E. Grandjean, Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2001.

15. T. Waters, V. Putz Anderson, A. Garg, and L. Fine, “Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks,” Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 749–776, 1993.