Lawrence Stenhouse in Curriculum Development: Integrative Review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This integrative review explores the work of Lawrence Stenhouse in curriculum development and its relevance in contemporary educational practices. Stenhouse challenged the traditional view of curriculum as a fixed set of content and advocated for a dynamic and student-centered approach. His concepts of curriculum as a process, inquiry-based learning, the teacher as a researcher, and the importance of contextualizing curriculum have significantly influenced the field of curriculum development. The study examines Stenhouse's ideas through a comprehensive review of scholarly literature, including articles, books, and other relevant sources. The findings highlight the enduring significance of Stenhouse's contributions in shaping contemporary curriculum development practices. Stenhouse's concept of curriculum as a process emphasizes flexibility, responsiveness, and the integration of students' needs and interests. This student-centered approach aligns with current educational philosophies that prioritize learner agency and engagement. The emphasis on curriculum as inquiry underscores Stenhouse's belief in fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, and active engagement in the learning process. By encouraging students to explore meaningful questions and develop deep understanding, Stenhouse promotes a more holistic and empowering educational experience. Stenhouse's view of the teacher as a researcher emphasizes the importance of ongoing professional development, reflective practice, and the integration of research and practice in curriculum development. The study also highlights the significance of contextualizing curriculum by considering the unique characteristics and needs of students, teachers, and the broader community. This contextual perspective ensures that curriculum is relevant, meaningful, and responsive to diverse educational settings. The findings of this study contribute to the ongoing conversation about curriculum development, providing valuable insights for educators, curriculum developers, and researchers. By embracing Stenhouse's ideas, educators can create engaging, student-centered, and contextually relevant curriculum that promotes critical thinking, empowers students, and fosters continuous improvement in educational practice.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation–limiting and facilitating factors. Making it relevant: Context based learning of science, 35-62.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2015). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press.
Elliott, J. (2015). Educational action research as the quest for virtue in teaching. Educational Action Research, 23(1), 4-21.
Elliott, J. (1994). The teacher's role in curriculum development: An unresolved issue in English attempts at curriculum reform. Curriculum studies, 2(1), 43-69.
Elliott, J. (2019). What is lesson study?. European Journal of Education, 54(2), 175-188.
Gleeson, J. (2022). Evolution of Irish curriculum culture: Understandings, policy, reform and change. Irish Educational Studies, 41(4), 713-733.
Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.
Kilag, O. K. T., Angtud, R. M. A., Uy, F. T., Alvez, G. G. T., Zamora, M. B., Canoy, C. B., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Exploring the Relationships among Work Motivation, Job Satisfaction, Administrative Support, and Performance of Teachers: A Comprehensive Study. International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3), 239-248.
Kilag, O. K. T., Bautista, J. L., Villegas, M. A. L., Bendanillo, A. A., Peñalosa, B. M., & Asentado, D. E. (2023). European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education (EJINE). European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education (EJINE), 3(6).
Kilag, O. K. T., Largo, J. M., Rabillas, A. R., Kilag, F. E., Angtud, M. K. A., Book, J. F. P., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Administrators’ Conflict Management and Strategies. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(2), 22-31.
Kilag, O. K. T., Malbas, M. H., Miñoza, J. R., Ledesma, M. M. R., Vestal, A. B. E., & Sasan, J. M. V. (2023). The Views of the Faculty on the Effectiveness of Teacher Education Programs in Developing Lifelong Learning Competence. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(2), 92-102.
McKernan, J. (1988). The countenance of curriculum action research: Traditional, collaborative, and emancipatory-critical conceptions. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 3(3), 173-200.
Sasan, J. M., & Baritua, J. C. (2022). Distance learning as a learning modality for education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science and Education, 3(8), 35-44.
Somekh, B. (1995). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology. British Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 339-355.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). Defining the curriculum problem. Cambridge Journal of Education, 5(2), 104-108.
Uy, F. T., Sasan, J. M., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). School Principal Administrative-Supervisory Leadership During the Pandemic: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 5(1), 44-62.