Cultivating an Inventor Mindset: A Culturo-Techno-Contextual Approach in STEM Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the cultivation of an inventor mindset in STEM education through a Culturo-Techno-Contextual approach. Drawing on a systematic literature review, the research synthesizes insights from diverse sources to illuminate key findings. Cultural factors were identified as pivotal, shaping inventive thinking with distinct approaches observed in individualistic and collectivist cultures. Technology emerged as a transformative force, enhancing creativity through hands-on exploration and collaborative learning. Contextual relevance proved crucial, with socioeconomic conditions, institutional policies, and regional challenges shaping effective intervention strategies. The interplay of culture, technology, and context was found to be intricate, emphasizing the need for an integrative perspective to foster a comprehensive and impactful STEM education. These findings hold implications for educators and policymakers, highlighting the importance of recognizing and leveraging cultural diversity, strategically integrating technology, and tailoring interventions to the unique contextual challenges faced by learners. By adopting a holistic Culturo-Techno-Contextual approach, stakeholders in STEM education can cultivate environments that not only impart technical knowledge but also nurture the creativity and problem-solving skills essential for the future success of learners in a dynamic global landscape.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Andrin, G., & Kilag, O. K. (2023). Innovative Strategies for Research Enhancement: A Simulacrum Approach Among Master Teachers in the Division of Cebu City. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 467-484.
Baker, M. (2018). Early childhood teachers at the center: A qualitative case study of professional development in an urban district. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(2), 231-240.
Brasche, I., & Thorn, B. (2018). Addressing dimensions of “The Great Moral Wrong”: How inequity in music education is polarizing the academic potential of Australian students. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(3), 124-136.
Chen, B., & Poquet, O. (2022). Networks in learning analytics: Where theory, methodology, and practice intersect. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(1), 1-12.
Cropley, A. (2006). Creativity: A social approach. Roeper Review, 28(3), 125-130.
Franco, P. F., & DeLuca, D. A. (2019). Learning through action: Creating and implementing a strategy game to foster innovative thinking in higher education. Simulation & Gaming, 50(1), 23-43.
Glazewski, K. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2020). Fostering complex problem solving for diverse learners: Engaging an ethos of intentionality toward equitable access. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 679-702.
Hanan, A., Marjani, G. I., Suherman, U., Firdaus, A., Albustomi, A. G., Goffary, I., ... & Arken, M. R. (2023, November). Harnessing Technology for Environmental Method: Cultivating High Order Thinking Skills for Sustainable Maritime Development Knowledge. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1265, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing.
Harris, A., & De Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19, 153-179.
Henriksen, D., Creely, E., Henderson, M., & Mishra, P. (2021). Creativity and technology in teaching and learning: a literature review of the uneasy space of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-18.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific journal of management, 1, 81-99.
Kilag, O. K. T., Indino, N. V., Sabagala, A. M., Abendan, C. F. K., Arcillo, M. T., & Camangyan, G. A. (2023). Managing Cybersecurity Risks in Educational Technology Environments: Strategies and Best Practices. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education (2993-2769), 1(5), 28-38.
Kilag, O. K. T., Lechadores, V. M. B., Tolin, J. E., Pahayahay, D. Q., Torrefiel, A. P., & Calzada, J. R. D. (2023). Moving beyond the new normal: Understanding Flexible Learning Options (FLOs) on the parameters of Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP). Science and Education, 4(2), 866-873.
Kilag, O. K., Tokong, C., Enriquez, B., Deiparine, J., Purisima, R., & Zamora, M. (2023). School Leaders: The Extent of Management Empowerment and Its Impact on Teacher and School Effectiveness. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(1), 127-140.
Kilag, O. K., Lisao, C., Lastimoso, J., Villa, F. L., & Miñoza, C. A. (2023). Bildung-Oriented Science Education: A Critical Review of Different Visions of Scientific Literacy. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(4), 115-127.
Kilag, O. K. T., Padilla, K. S., Yorong, F. S., & Merabedes, J. G. A. (2023). Importance of Upskilling and Reskilling in Educational Leadership and Management. European Journal of Learning on History and Social Sciences, 1(1), 49-57.
Kilag, O. K. T., Heyrosa-Malbas, M., Villar, S. P., & Arong, S. L. (2023). Maria Montessori's Pedagogy and its Potential to Promote Peace Education in the Philippines.
Kilag, O. K. T., Taboada, A. R. G., Zamora, M. B., Rabi, J. I. I. A., Calzada, J. R. D., & Manire, E. A. (2023). Exploring Effective Environmental Education Practices to Enhance Environmental Awareness and Education: A Navigational Study. International Journal of Formal Education, 2(6), 14-27.
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1-17.
Manire, E., Kilag, O. K., Habig, M., Satin, R., Genovania, M. R., & Tan, S. J. (2023). A Technological Approach to Early Childhood Education: Unveiling the SEEDS Pedagogy. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(5), 333-344.
Manubag, M., Kilag, O. K., Peñalosa, B., Timtim, J. M., Padilla, J. B., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Empowering Skills Development: Exploring the Role of Technology Management in Technical Vocational Education Enhancement. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(5), 195-208.
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in education: a review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832.
Moldavan, A. M., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). Navigating (and disrupting) the digital divide: Urban teachers’ perspectives on secondary mathematics instruction during COVID-19. The Urban Review, 1-26.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Accessed 25 November 2014. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10999/the-engineer-of-2020-visions-of-engineering-in-the-new.
Nie, K. (2023). Nottingham Trent University as an example of how the development of web technologies has influenced the layout of social spaces.
O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM education, 7, 1-15.
Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large‐scale assessment. Educational measurement: issues and practice, 37(1), 21-34.
Sivaraj, R., Ellis, J. A., Wieselmann, J. R., & Roehrig, G. H. (2020). Computational participation and the learner‐technology pairing in K‐12 STEM education. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 387-400.
Tan, O. S. (2021). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Gale Cengage Learning.
Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zhang, Y. (2022). The research on critical thinking teaching strategies in college English classroom. Creative Education, 13(4), 1469-1485.